From Data to Impact
If your teams produce reports and dashboards but too few recommendations and actions come out of them, this journey is a place to start.
Better thinking. Better decisions. Stronger organizations.
Applied programmes for turning data into insight, defining problems accurately, choosing between options with stated reasons, and moving thinking into action.
You can choose a single programme, complement your existing academy, or build a linked development journey for your team. Content, examples and exercises are shaped around the experience of the target group and the business context of the organization.
When several capabilities need to develop together, the programmes are linked around one shared business problem. Participants approach the same topic from different angles and improve their output at each stage. Two to three training days in total, with work-based application between sessions.
The structures below are examples and are adapted to the organization's need: a module can be swapped, or another one added from the catalogue. Scope is usually kept to two or three modules, so that a participant can carry a single business problem all the way through.
If your teams produce reports and dashboards but too few recommendations and actions come out of them, this journey is a place to start.
If teams move to solutions quickly while causes, assumptions and options go under-examined, this journey gives the decision process a structure.
When managers need to strengthen the conditions for thinking, learning, trust and ownership in their teams, this journey works on everyday leadership practice.
Designed for organizations that want the use of AI to develop alongside their people's learning, questioning and ownership.
For sales and customer teams that need to understand the customer need in depth, assess the opportunity, and present their recommendation in a form the customer's decision process can use.
Each programme can be taken on its own, integrated into your existing academy, or run as part of a journey.
The work begins by clarifying what needs to be different in the target group's job. An existing report, decision, customer opportunity or team problem can be chosen as the ground for the exercises. Where needed, synthetic data and cases reflecting the organization's context are prepared.
The core of the methods stays the same; the examples, exercises and expected output are tailored to your organization. Assignments between sessions, manager involvement and reinforcement work are planned according to the scope of the programme chosen.
Needs definition and in-session application are part of every engagement.
How far on-the-job follow-up and reinforcement go depends on scope: the intended change in behaviour, the participant profile, time and budget are weighed together.
The criteria follow the aim of the programme. In decision-focused work, for example, the participant's work product is examined through the clarity of the problem definition, the separation of evidence from interpretation, the treatment of alternatives and the reasoning behind the recommendation. The point is not to score, but to make the steps of thinking visible and to base the feedback on them.
The output produced in the session and the behaviour observed at work are assessed separately. The second is tracked only in programmes whose scope includes on-the-job follow-up.
Back to contentsIn work with a bank's Talent and Culture team, the aim was for participants to read data accurately, turn findings into insight, and present their recommendations in decision-ready form. The exercises were built on synthetic data sets and cases written for an HR context.
What participants produced: short executive narratives connecting finding, meaning, impact and recommendation.
What followed: a second programme was designed and is now being delivered to support the same group's Excel skills.
More than 30 years of corporate experience in banking, retail, fintech and technology, with senior management responsibility for a large part of it. Much of what is worked on in the sessions comes from situations encountered first-hand in those roles.
On the academic side: Industrial Engineering at METU, an MBA and a doctorate in Management and Organization at Yeditepe University, with work focused on knowledge management.
About the instructorDuration, group size and delivery format are settled according to the intended output.
Back to contentsWhich team, and what would you like them to do better? In a first conversation we can clarify the target group, the business need and the expected output together. From there I can propose a single programme, content support for your existing academy, or a linked development journey.
Topic of interest: